jump to navigation

Big Philanthropy June 26, 2006

Posted by federalist in Economic Policy.
trackback

Thanks to Warren Buffet’s commitment, the Gates Foundation now has more than $60 billion at its disposal.  With resources of that magnitude under the complete control of a single individual, projects can be undertaken that are simply impossible to pull together when they require the resources and consent of large groups.

Yet while it has clearly identified its priorities (mostly in the fields of global health and education) the Gates Foundation often appears to lack focus.  For example, this year it has made more than 200 separate grants, some for as little as $1,000.  It has devoted more than a billion dollars to numerous educational scholarships.  These are all wonderful acts of charity, but their piecemeal nature squanders the benefits that could accrue from focusing massive resources on singular “moon-shot” projects.

For example, whether one philanthropist spends $1 billion endowing scholarships or one thousand donors each spend $1 million, the net benefit is roughly the same.  But the billionaire philanthropist could fund basic research and development efforts – say, in the fields of vaccines (which the Gates Foundation does) or alternative energy – that would never come together if they had to wait for the private donations of thousands of individuals to even get off the ground, or if they were subject to the political turbulence of government funding.

It is wonderful that these private fortunes are being devoted to charitable endeavors instead of fleets of solid-gold yachts.  But big philanthropy can make even greater contributions to humanity by focusing exclusively on the infrastructure, development, and research projects with such high barriers to entry that no one else can attempt them.

About these ads

Comments»

1. federalist - May 26, 2009

Wealth Report’s post, “Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population,” suggests the billionaires’ club may not get this concept…. China and many other oppressive governments, not to mention anarchic African societies, have shown ample capacity for controlling population growth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers

%d bloggers like this: